How Do You Answer Business Valuation Questions in ACCA AFM?
Valuation questions in ACCA AFM reward method and judgement in equal measure. Here's how to work asset, earnings and cash-flow approaches, degear and regear betas, and discuss the assumptions.
Business valuation is a core ACCA AFM topic and a demanding one, because it blends multi-step computation with genuine judgement. A single question can ask you to value a target several ways, adjust a cost of capital for a different capital structure, and then advise on which figure is most reliable. Method marks are generous if you show your steps — and the discussion is where the strongest candidates pull ahead.
Know the main approaches
Be ready to apply and contrast the standard methods, each with different strengths:
- Asset-based: net assets at book or fair value — a floor value that ignores intangibles and future earnings.
- Earnings-based: a price-earnings multiple applied to sustainable earnings, sensitive to the multiple chosen.
- Dividend valuation model: useful for a minority stake, dependent on the growth assumption.
- Free cash flow / discounted cash flow: forecast free cash flows discounted at an appropriate rate — the most theoretically sound but the most assumption-heavy.
Rule 1: Degear and regear the beta correctly
Where the target's business risk differs from the acquirer's, or the capital structure is changing, you'll need to take an equity beta from a proxy company, degear it to an asset beta, then regear it to the relevant capital structure before feeding it into CAPM. This multi-step chain is heavily marked — set out each stage clearly so the method marks stand even if a figure is wrong.
Rule 2: Own-figure marks reward the method
Valuation is computationally forgiving under the marking scheme: each structural step — free cash flow, cost of capital, terminal value, the final valuation assembly — earns its method mark even when the numbers are wrong, provided the approach is right. Show every step; a hidden calculation or a single figure with no workings throws marks away.
Rule 3: The discussion carries real marks
A number without commentary is a half-finished answer. Explain the assumptions behind each method, why the valuations differ, the limitations of each approach, and which is most appropriate for this deal and this stake. This discussion is marked on merit and is often where the difference between a pass and a fail sits — so don't rush it to protect calculation time you didn't need.
Rule 4: Give a range and a recommendation
Different methods give different values on purpose. Present them as a range, explain what a buyer versus a seller would argue, and recommend a defensible figure. A single number with no reasoning misses the advisory marks the question is really testing.
The takeaway
Valuation questions reward disciplined method plus judgement: apply and contrast the approaches, degear and regear betas step by step, show every calculation so own-figure marks survive, and discuss assumptions and limitations before recommending a range. The advice is the answer, not the arithmetic.
The difficulty is that a valuation answer feels finished once the numbers foot — but the method marks you missed and the thin discussion don't show up on a reread. The 50% Club marks your practice AFM answers against the official ACCA scheme, pinpointing where a degearing step, a cash-flow line or the discussion lost marks — and which method marks you still earned — so your working and your judgement both score.